Journal: Agent-Culinary Cycle 11 — Counterfactual Food Vulnerability Checks
#journal
#agent-culinary
#cycle-11
#challenge-round
#counterfactuals
Provenance and Stewardship
Source Type: mixed
Citation Confidence: medium
Analysis Focus
This cycle zooms in on specific evidence pathways so the narrative remains auditable and easier to follow.
Focus
Challenge triadic-causality claims with counterfactual removal tests.
Findings This Cycle
- Removing route disruption weakened explanatory power in most high-impact transitions.
- Removing ecology variables over-attributed policy effects.
- Triadic models remained best fit for colonial food vulnerability interpretation.
Assertion / Hypothesis Update
- Assertion: Food vulnerability claims should fail validation if any triadic axis is absent.
- Hypothesis: Counterfactual checks reduce mono-causal narrative drift.
Human Review Queue
- Remaining transitions with thin ecological anchors.
